Until You Can't Tell Mordecai from Haman
A lighthearted look at the source of the obligation to get drunk on Purim.
By Jeffrey A. Spitzer
Does Judaism encourage drinking? In reference to Purim,
the Talmud states that one is to drink to the point of not knowing the
difference between "cursed is Haman" and "blessed is
Mordechai." In modern times, the sensitivity to alcohol abuse has caused
this custom to lose popularity among many groups, while still remaining strong
in others. In the spirit of Purim, this article looks at traditional
definitions of what it means to drink too much. Spitzer urges anyone who reads
this article to seek halakhic (Jewish legal) advice about the
"obligation" to get drunk on Purim from someone who is a competent,
and preferably sober, halakhic authority.
When it comes to drinking on Purim, the Talmud clearly
understood what the scroll of Esther (the Megillah) was all about. In
practically every chapter of the Megillah, someone is imbibing heavily at a
drinking party. And the scroll concludes with Mordecai's instruction to the
entire Jewish people to celebrate these days as "yemei mishteh
v'simchah, days of drinking and rejoicing" (Esther 9:22).
An ambiguous law like that, however, would not be left
unqualified by the rabbis. On Passover, precise amounts are defined so that one
may fulfill the obligations of eating matzah and drinking the four cups of
wine. So one might expect that the rabbis would define "days of
drinking" in terms of the volume of wine or the number of hours one would
be obligated to drink.
The rabbis of the Talmud paid close attention to the nature
of the obligation. On Passover, the four cups of wine are for joy and for
sanctification, but they also have symbolic associations with the expressions
that God used for Israel's redemption. On Purim, however, the wine (or liquor)
is not symbolic. It is functional. Consequently, the nature of the obligation
is not defined by volume, but rather, by the effect upon the drinker.
How Drunk Is Drunk?
"Rava said: It is one's duty levasumei, to make
oneself fragrant [with wine] on Purim until one cannot tell the difference
between 'arur Haman' (cursed be Haman) and 'barukh Mordekhai'
(blessed be Mordecai)" (Babylonian Talmud, Megillah 7b).
What degree of drunkenness is meant by this? The word
levasumei is sometimes translated as "get mellow;" others simply say
"drink." The word levasumei, however, is from the same root as besamim
(fragrant spices, like those that are smelled during Havdalah at the conclusion
of the Sabbath). Minimally, one must drink so that others would smell it,
although if they are also drunk, who would be able to check? Maximally, one
must become, to use a technical term, "stinking drunk."
Most people assume that one must become so befuddled that
one can no longer distinguish between the most wicked of people and the most righteous.
Some, however, have noted that the two phrases, "arur Haman"
and "barukh Mordekhai" have the same numerical value according
to the traditional counting of the Hebrew letters called gematria (502).
This point is somewhat obscure. Are we to assume that people are sober enough
to calculate the gematria of these phrases, but drunk enough to get the words
confused because they have the same gematria? However puzzling, this seems to
be the opinion of the 17th century halakhist R. Abraham Abele ben Hayyim haLevi
Gombiner.
Alcohol and Swordplay Don't Mix
Perhaps the Talmud tells the following story in order to
provide some degree of clarification of Rava's requirement to get drunk:
Rabbah and R. Zeira got together for Purim Seudah
(the feast on the afternoon of Purim). They got very drunk, and Rabbah got up
and cut R. Zeira's throat (literally, Rabbah butchered him). The next day,
Rabbah prayed on R. Zeira's behalf and brought him back to life. A year later,
Rabbah asked, "Would you like to have Purim Seudah with me again this
year?" R. Zeira replied, "One cannot count on a miracle every
time." (Megillah 7b)
Cute story, but what does it have to do with how much one is
supposed to drink? Traditional interpreters have four basic approaches. The
most eminent sources, including the Rosh, the Tur, and Yosef Karo, simply quote
Rava's statement that one "becomes fragrant" without any reference to
the story of Rabbah. Presumably, R. Zeira had a hard night, but why should that
spoil the party for everyone else?!
The opposite approach is attributed to the late 11th-century
North African halakhist Rabbenu Ephraim ibn Avi Alragan, "Based on the
story of Rabbah getting up and slaughtering R. Zeira, we reject the statement
of Rava, and it is wrong to act in such a way" (quoted by the Ra"n,
ad. loc.).
Maimonides, however, replaces the "can't tell the
difference between Haman and Mordecai" standard with one that is more
easily appraised:
How does one fulfill the obligation of the Purim
Seudah? One should eat meat and prepare as nice a meal as one can afford and
drink wine until one becomes drunk and falls asleep from drunkenness. (Laws of
Megillah 2:15)
Falls asleep? Many contemporary halakhists see Maimonides as
limiting the application of Rava's "can't tell the difference…" rule;
one only has to get drunk enough to fall asleep. This reading is strange.
Rigorous double-blind controlled testing reports that one loses the ability to
count up gematria significantly quicker than one passes out in a drunken
stupor. Nevertheless, if Maimonides, who was, after all, a doctor, says that
one hasn't fulfilled one's obligation until one is out cold on the floor, then
maybe that should be the standard. Of course, from a public health perspective,
going to sleep is preferable to picking up a sword (or car keys).
Maimonides' reading finds substantial support in the
comments of the 16th-century Talmud commentator R. Samuel Eliezer ben Judah
haLevi Edels, better known as the Maharsha. The Maharsha understands the story
of Rabbah and R. Zeira as an example of figurative language:
It is surprising to explain this as if Rabbah
actually committed this crime, but rather, it is as if Rabbah butchered
him. That is to say, Rabbah urged R. Zeira to drink too much until he got sick
and almost died… The words "brought him back to life" in both the
Bible and the Talmud can simply mean healing.
If the Maharsha's reading underlies Maimonides' ruling that
one should drink until one passes out, then perhaps, against the opinion of
Rabbenu Ephraim ibn Avi Alragan, the story of Rabbah and R. Zeira is meant to
be indicative of normative practice (the drinking, not the swordplay).
As the Italian commentator, R. Hizkiyah ben David DaSilva
points out, if the story of Rabbah were meant to indicate that Rava's rule had
been rejected, then why would R. Zeira refuse to join Rabbah the following
year? Clearly, R. Zeira expected that Rabbah would continue to drink heavily on
Purim (Peri Hadash). Following this line of reasoning, the point of the story
is that one should get drunk until one is "dead to the world."
Hopefully, one also has a friend who can nurse one back to sobriety, or at
least back to consciousness.
When Not To Drink on Purim
More recent halakhic commentators have been somewhat more
limited. The 18th-century codifier, R. Abraham ben Yehiel Michal Danzig wrote:
Since the entire miracle of Purim came about through
wine, our sages obligated us to get drunk, or at least to drink more than what
we are used to, in order to remember the great miracle. However, if one knows
oneself, and is likely to neglect the performance of a mitzvah
[commandment], such as washing one's hands before eating bread or making a
blessing over food before and after eating or that one might forget to pray or
might act in a light-headed way, it is better not to get drunk. (Quoted in
Be'ur Halakhah 694, s.v. "Ad")
Don't get so drunk that you forget to perform any mitzvot.
And count among those mitzvot the contemporary obligation to have a designated
driver. Cars can be like Rabbah's sword, and one cannot count on a miracle.
Jeffrey A. Spitzer is the senior educator at Jewish Family & Life! and a
contributing editor to MyJewishLearning..
